 |
| 等 级：资深长老 |
| 经 验 值：7264 |
| 魅 力 值：728 |
| 龙 币：13689 |
| 积 分：7376.3 |
| 注册日期：2006-12-08 |
| |
|
|
|
前几天与在美国的几个同学在微信上也谈到这个话题(关于爱因斯坦信不信上帝这个话题)，我导过来一下对话
前几天与在美国的几个同学在微信上也谈到这个话题，我倒过来一下对话：(主要就是在美国一个大学做教授的a在说话）
a爱因斯坦不信上帝的
a犹太人，信也不是基督教
b犹太人信什么教？
a耶和华，圣经旧约
a不信基督
b这么复杂，不懂
a很多也不信了 ———注：指很多犹太人连耶和华也不信了
a这个问题我仔细研究过
a我回头发过来
The word 'God' is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, and religious scripture a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can (for me) change this.
a他不信基督教的神
a不信personal god
a就是不信和个人有交流的神
a基督教是讲personal god的
Princeton, 3. 1. 1954
Dear Mr Gutkind,
Inspired by Brouwer's repeated suggestion, I read a great deal in your book, and thank you very much for lending it to me. What struck me was this: with regard to the factual attitude to life and to the human community we have a great deal in common. Your personal ideal with its striving for freedom from ego-oriented desires, for making life beautiful and noble, with an emphasis on the purely human element. This unites us as having an "unAmerican attitude."
Still, without Brouwer's suggestion I would never have gotten myself to engage intensively with your book because it is written in a language inaccessible to me. The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can change this for me. For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstition. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong, and whose thinking I have a deep affinity for, have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything "chosen" about them.
In general I find it painful that you claim a privileged position and try to defend it by two walls of pride, an external one as a man and an internal one as a Jew. As a man you claim, so to speak, a dispensation from causality otherwise accepted, as a Jew the privilege of monotheism. But a limited causality is no longer a causality at all, as our wonderful Spinoza recognized with all incision, probably as the first one. And the animistic interpretations of the religions of nature are in principle not annulled by monopolization. With such walls we can only attain a certain self-deception, but our moral efforts are not furthered by them. On the contrary.
Now that I have quite openly stated our differences in intellectual convictions it is still clear to me that we are quite close to each other in essential things, i.e; in our evaluations of human behavior. What separates us are only intellectual "props" and "rationalization" in Freud's language. Therefore I think that we would understand each other quite well if we talked about concrete things.
With friendly thanks and best wishes,
Yours,
A. Einstein
a他把一个犹太哲学家损了一通
a他信宇宙教，呵呵，宇宙的规律就是神
c更像是不可知论者，我觉得
d看不懂
a对，不信基督和犹太教是肯定的
a Cosmology religion
a Google translate
|
| |
|
|
2013-11-29 18:06:19
